January 18, 2006
Contact: Sibel Edmonds, sedmonds@nswbc.org
FBI
Penetrated; Again!
By Sibel Edmonds
According to an AP news article today by Ted Bridis,
the FBI missed internal signs of espionage in the case of Bureau Intelligence
Analyst Leandro Aragoncillo. To read the AP article
go to: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2006/01/17/national/w112316S38.DTL
.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation has continued to
make short shrift of personnel security on the heels of the well-known Robert
Hanssen Spy scandal, and in the middle of a war on terrorism. Despite several
IG reports, congressional inquiries, and media reports on several other recent
cases of alleged espionage activities, the bureau’s inability to secure even
its own offices continues today. Here is an agency that is in charge of defending
our national security and protecting our safety, but it has yet to prove it is
capable of securing itself. The following incidents are glaring examples of the
FBI’s failure to address its own security vulnerabilities and its unwillingness
to hold its management accountable. Moreover, the United States Congress has
yet to address these cases.
FBI & Uninvestigated Espionage
Cases
Report by Sibel D. Edmonds, Former
Language Specialist; FBI:
Melek Can Dickerson, a Turkish Translator, was hired
by the FBI after September 11, and was placed in charge of translating the most
sensitive information related to terrorists and criminals under the Bureau’s
investigation. She was granted Top Secret Clearance, which is supposed to be
granted only after conducting a thorough background investigation. However,
according to FBI officials, she had previously worked for semi-legit
organizations that were FBI’s targets of investigation, and had on going
relationships with two individuals who were FBI’s targets of investigation. For
months she blocked all-important information related to these semi-legit
organizations and the individuals she and her husband associated with. She
stamped hundreds, if not thousands, of documents related to these targets as ‘Not
Pertinent’, and attempted to prevent others from translating these
documents - important to the FBI’s investigations and our fight against
terrorism. Further, she and her husband attempted to recruit others, including
myself, to work for the FBI target under investigation.
Dickerson, with the assistance of her direct
supervisor, Mike Feghali, took hundreds of pages of top-secret sensitive
intelligence documents outside the FBI to unknown recipients. She, with the
assistance of her direct supervisor, forged signatures on top-secret documents
related to certain 9/11 detainees. Even after these incidents were confirmed
and reported to FBI management, she was allowed to remain in her position, to
continue the translation of sensitive intelligence received by the FBI, and to
maintain her Top Secret Clearance. Apparently, bureaucratic mid-level FBI
management and administrators decided that it would not look good for the
Bureau if this security breach and espionage case was investigated and made
public, especially after Robert Hanssen’s case (FBI spy scandal). The Dickerson
case was confirmed by the Senate Judiciary Committee (Please refer to
Senator Leahy and Grassley’s letters dated June 19 and August 13, 2002, and
Senator Grassley’s statement on CBS-60 Minutes in October 2002), and
received major coverage by the press. According to Director Mueller, the
Inspector General criticized the FBI for failing to adequately pursue this
espionage report regarding Dickerson (Please refer to DOJ-IG report Re:
Sibel Edmonds and FBI Translation).
Today, almost four years since the Dickerson incident
was reported to the FBI, and more than three years since this information was
confirmed by the United States Congress and reported by the press, the
administrators in charge of FBI personnel security and language departments in
the FBI remain in their positions and in charge of translation quality and
translation departments’ security. Dickerson and several FBI targets of
investigation hastily left the United States in 2002, and the case still remains
uninvestigated criminally. This case was not referred to the FBI
Counterespionage division, as it is required by the FBI’s own protocol. It
needs to be investigated and criminally prosecuted - it is a clear case of
espionage. The translation of our intelligence is being entrusted to
individuals with loyalties to our enemies; important ‘chit-chats’ and
‘chatters’ are being intentionally blocked.
Report by John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist; FBI:
While assigned to the FBI’s South East Asia counterintelligence program
I was asked to provide risk assessments on applicants applying for language
specialists’ positions within the FBI.
These applicants, all of whom were born foreign nationals and naturalized
U.S. citizens, applied for language specialist positions within the FBI. One of these applicants, Hadiya Roberts, was
an individual originally from Pakistan.
In reviewing Roberts’ application I suspected that there were several
areas that had not been fully investigated.
Upon further investigation, such as simply running name checks on
Roberts’ family members, this suspicion was reinforced. When running Roberts’ father’s name through
the FBI’s Automated Case System (ACS) several hits came up. Upon further review it was determined that
Roberts’ father was a retired Pakistani general. What was more disturbing was the fact that his name came up as
having formerly been the defense military attaché at the Pakistani Embassy in
Washington D.C. Having worked the
Pakistani program it was well known that all Pakistani defense military
attaches were Pakistani intelligence officers.
I wrote this all up and submitted it to the FBI’s Security Programs
Division. In fact the personnel
security specialist that reviewed my findings thanked me and stated “I also reviewed this file and felt there were major
problems”. A week later the security
specialist telephoned me to ask who in the Counterterrorism Division should
also review the applicants file. (One
of the recommendations made was to have the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division
also prepare a risk assessment on the applicant) I gave the personnel security specialist the name of the
Counterterrorism Specialist at which time she stated “not
that it matters because Hadiya Roberts has been hired and reported to work
today.” She went on to further state
that Roberts has been given a Top Secret clearance and access to sensitive
compartmental information. A few weeks
later there was information that arrived from an FBI Field Division that
someone had provided the Pakistanis with classified information. The case was open as an UNSUB (unknown
subject) case.
Despite my findings on several of the risk assessments that I completed the FBI continued to hire and provide top clearances and accesses to these individuals. I had written letters regarding these security lapses to the Security programs and up the FBI’s Chain of Command to include Director Mueller. Unfortunately, nothing was ever done. Instead FBI management decided to come after me, the “kill the messenger” culture that exists in the FBI. I continued to bring these security and mismanagement issues to management and to the Senate. Due to my persistence FBI management decided to reorganize the programs. In doing so they took the Southeast Asian program away from me and gave me the Sub Sahara African program. Needless to say there was not much going on in that program. However, after reviewing the cases within the program an individual brought me an espionage case involving the Sub Sahara African area.
I began reviewing the case and realized that the case involved a former
FBI language specialist. The case was
out of the FBI’s Washington Field Division.
It seemed odd that the case was classified a preliminary inquiry instead
of a full investigation. I state this
because there was overwhelming evidence to justify a full investigation. In fact I believe there was sufficient evidence
to convict the subject. I state this
for several reasons. The FBI had several
well-placed reliable sources that confirmed that the subject was working and
providing information to a foreign intelligence service. In fact, one source informed the FBI that
while he/she was in the presence of the foreign intelligence officer, he/she
was informed not to say anything while at the foreign mission. When the source inquired why the
intelligence officer informed him/her that “ the FBI
is monitoring the mission and has it wired”. When the source asked the
intelligence officer how he/she knew this the intelligence officer stated “we
know because we have a translator within the FBI that is working for us”. Despite this information and the
confirmation of the name of the FBI’s language specialist nothing was ever
done. When I inquired about the case
and asked why there was not a full investigation on the subject, why wasn’t the
FBI Field division aggressively pursuing the case, etc. my supervisor took the
case away from me. After that I was
relieved from my program responsibilities.
Report by
Behrooz Sarshar, Former Language Specialist; FBI:
According to Behrooz Sarshar, Retired FBI Translator for Farsi Language,
in 2001 an Iranian translator working for the FBI-New York Field Office was
found to be working for the target(s) of FBI counterintelligence and criminal
investigations. This translator was providing the FBI targets with
tips/information, and was tampering with intelligence/information in Farsi
gathered by the FBI. The FBI asked this translator to resign and leave quietly.
NO criminal investigation and NO damage assessment were
conducted.
In January 2002, Mr. Sarshar reported to the Department of Justice
Inspector General Office incidents involving a certain Middle-Eastern
translator who regularly removed Top Secret Documents/Audio Tapes and Laptop
containing classified and extremely sensitive intelligence from the FBI
premises. This individual reportedly shared these TS documents with foreign
individuals outside the FBI. Mr. Sarshar and Ms. Pari Pakravan (Former
translator, FBI-WFO) repeatedly reported these security breaches to the FBI
management and security for several years (1997-2001), but NO action was
taken.
Reports
by Special Agent Donald Levy & Special Agent Robert Wright; FBI:
Donald Lavey, who worked in counterterrorism for 20 years at
the FBI, said wiretap translations by Mideast-born agents should have a
"second opinion," because their backgrounds may "prejudice"
their interpretation and analysis.
"We are at war, and we need more than one translator
for each subject under electronic surveillance," he said. "We are
relying too heavily on single Arab translators for significant information, and
worse yet, investigative guidance." Lavey recalls a problem with a former
Arab translator in the FBI's Detroit office who tried to back out of secretly
recording a fellow Muslim suspected of terrorism by claiming the subject had
threatened his life. Levy also cites the more recent case of Gamal Abdel-Hafiz,
an immigrant Muslim, who twice refused on religious grounds to tape-record
Muslim terrorist suspects, hindering investigations of a bin Laden
family-financed bank in New Jersey and Florida professor Sami Al-Arian,
recently indicted for his ties to the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist
group.
A fellow FBI agent, Robert Wright, said Abdel-Hafiz finally
explained to him that "a Muslim does not record another Muslim,"
after first claiming he feared for his life. Other agents said he contacted
Arab subjects under investigation without disclosing the contacts to the agents
running the cases. Despite his divided loyalties, the FBI subsequently promoted
Abdel-Hafiz by assigning him to the U.S. Embassy in Saudi Arabia, a critical
post for intelligence-gathering. Three-fourths of the Sept. 11 hijackers were
Saudis. After Wright and another agent blew the whistle in the media, he was
put on administrative leave.
Reports
by the Department of Justice Inspector General:
According to The Justice Department
Inspector General Report on November 15, 2002: “ A language Specialist was
dismissed for unauthorized contacts with foreign officials and intelligence
officers, receipts of things of value from them, and lack of condor in his
‘convoluted and contradictory responses’ to questions about his contacts.” [DOJ-OIG Report, November 15, 2002].
However, the report does not mention any criminal investigation and/or
prosecution regarding this case. Like all other cases mentioned above, this
case was not referred to the FBI-Counterespionage Division.
Also, according to the Justice
Department Inspector General Report in August 2003: “ In our review, we observed
serious deficiencies in nearly every aspect of the FBI’s internal
security program, from personnel security, to computer security,
document security, and security training and compliance.” The
report includes 21 recommendations for the FBI aimed at improving its ability
to detect and investigate security breaches and potential espionage. “Some
of the most serious weaknesses still have not been fully remedied and
expose the FBI to the risk of serious compromises by other moles.” [DOJ-OIG Report, August 2003].
Additional Information:
1.
Letter
from Senator Patrick Leahy on August 13, 2002: “Ms. Edmonds alleged that a
contract monitor once worked for an organization under FBI’s
counter-intelligence investigation and that this monitor had contacts with a
foreign national who was a member of the target institution.” The letter
states that even after verifying these allegations, “the FBI downplayed the
importance of this matter and seemed to imply that it ceased to looking into
the complaints as a security matter until after the Inspector General finished
their investigation.” [See Attached, U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy, the Letter
to AG Ashcroft on August 13, 2002]
a.
“Ms.
Edmonds has alleged that this contract monitor in her unit ‘chose’ not
to translate important, intelligence-related information, instead limiting her
translations to unimportant and innocuous information. The FBI has verified
that this monitor indeed failed to translate certain material properly, but has
attributed the failure to a lack of training.”
b.
The
subject translator continued to work for the FBI Washington Field Office with
full access to Top Secret intelligence information/documents for 6 months after
the start of IG investigation and after the FBI confirmed her ties to the
subjects of FBI investigation and her other security violations.
2.
Letter
From Senator Grassley and Senator Leahy on June 19, 2002: “Ms. Edmonds has reported, and
the FBI has confirmed, that another contract linguist in the FBI Unit failed to
translate at least two communications reflecting a foreign official’s handling
of intelligence matters. The FBI has confirmed that the contract linguist had
“Unreported contacts” with that foreign official.” [See attached letter
from Senator Patrick Leahy and Senator Charles Grassley on June 19, 2002]
Edmonds, Sibel, Former Language
Specialist, FBI
Sibel Edmonds is the founder
& director of National Security Whistleblowers Coalition. She worked as a
language specialist for the FBI’s Washington Field Office. During her work with
the bureau, she discovered and reported serious acts of security breaches,
cover-ups, and intentional blocking of intelligence that had national security
implications. After she reported these acts to FBI management, she was
retaliated against by the FBI and ultimately fired in March 2002. Since that
time, court proceedings on her issues have been blocked by the assertion of
“State Secret Privilege” by Attorney General Ashcroft; the Congress of the
United States has been gagged and prevented from any discussion of her case
through retroactive re-classification by the Department of Justice; and the
report on her case issued by the Department of Justice Inspector General has been
entirely classified. Ms. Edmonds is fluent in Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani;
and has a MA in Public Policy and International Commerce from George Mason
University GMU, and a BA in Criminal Justice and Psychology from George
Washington University.
Cole, John
M., Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist, FBI
John M. Cole, Former Veteran
Intelligence Operations Specialist worked for 18 years in the FBI’s
Counterintelligence Division as an Intelligence Operations specialist.
Beginning in 1999, he discovered and began reporting serious issues of
mismanagement, gross negligence, waste of government funds, security breaches,
cover-ups, and intentional blocking of intelligence that had national security
implications. He wrote these issues in several letters to FBI management, to
include Director Mueller to no avail. After he reported these acts to FBI
management, he was retaliated against, suspended and ultimately left the FBI in
March 2004.
About National Security Whistleblowers Coalition
National Security Whistleblowers Coalition (NSWBC), founded in
August 2004, is an independent and nonpartisan alliance of whistleblowers who
have come forward to address our nation’s security weaknesses; to inform
authorities of security vulnerabilities in our intelligence agencies, at
nuclear power plants and weapon facilities, in airports, and at our nation’s
borders and ports; to uncover government waste, fraud, abuse, and in some cases
criminal conduct. The NSWBC is dedicated to aiding national security whistleblowers
through a variety of methods, including advocacy of governmental and legal
reform, educating the public concerning whistleblowing activity, provision of
comfort and fellowship to national security whistleblowers suffering
retaliation and other harms, and working with other public interest
organizations to affect goals defined in the NSWBC mission statement. For
more on NSWBC visit www.nswbc.org